Tuesday, December 21, 2010

because this is what made me laugh today

According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall [in northern europe] will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said.

from a march 30, 2000 independent article entitled
"snowfalls are now just a thing of the past"

 as you consider the above quote, from an article similar in its alarmist tone to thousands of others written during the golden age of global-warming hysteria, i invite you to peruse the following images which beautifully capture the weather conditions which are presently paralyzing northern europe:





and then i want all you true believers--you know, those of you who didn't wake up when they had to change the spin from global "warming" to global "climate change"

i.e., those of you who are not laughing along with me

to ask yourselves the following simple question:  if climate scientists can't even accurately predict what the climate's gonna be like in a mere ten years, how could you possibly believe they can tell us where we're gonna be in a hundred?

and then get back to me--i'm waiting.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

ghost story


all i have to say about the following story is what i said back then, and what i will maintain unto my grave:  (a) andrew was a singularly supple piece of ass; and (b) that motherfucker moved without any goddam help from me.

*     *     *     *     *
weho, 1992 (or thereabouts)

i still remember how it all started: i was fuckingdating this hot, snarky little blond south african number, to whom my roommate-at-the-time paul took a particular shine. one day when he was over at the house, paul roped him into a discussion of one of his favorite subjects: the paranormal.

having heard it all before, i tried to head him off, but was too late--turns out andrew was into all that shit, and before i knew it, my other roommate royce was involved and the three of 'em had a pre-party seance planned for the following saturday night.

after andrew left, i remember asking 'em what the fuck, and they told me not to worry--it'd be fun.

when i inquired as to how exactly we would be communicating with the spirit world and paul whipped out his ouija board, i couldn't help it--i burst out laughing, even though i knew that was a mistake.

see, it was always two-against-one in that house.  as the guy who was there only because they needed a third, i had met paul exactly once before the three of us moved into 841 north crescent heights boulevard, and royce only on the day of.

they, on the other hand, had known each other for years, were several years younger and had been out forever--and took every opportunity to remind me of same.

oh, and the other thing they had in common?  paul and royce were both poz back when that was still a death sentence--which perilous status, they explained to me on that particular day, had conferred upon them them an extrasensory sensitivity unknown to the rest of us mere mortals.

"let's just say we're both on speaking terms with the other side, mike," paul told me, "but royce is closer."  royce confirmed this with a solemn nod.

when i snorted again, paul asked, "you ever play with a ouija board when you were a kid?"

"of course i did--that's why i find this shit so ridiculous."

"c'mere--sit across from me."

to humor him, i pulled up a chair, did as he asked.  he balanced the board on our knees, we rested our fingertips on the planchette and, working together, spent a few minutes spelling out words royce called out.

it was every bit as slow and jerky a process as i remembered--even a simple word like "cat" required concentration and the coordination of two people's movements in searching out each letter on the board.

"see how hard it is when you consciously try to do it?"

when i nodded, he smiled, replaced the board in its box and said, "remember that when saturday night rolls around, ok?"

i had no idea what he meant, but i'd find out soon enough.

*     *     *     *     *

by the time saturday night did roll around, word had gotten out--we had a full house.  the lights were dimmed, candles lit, margaritas flowing and chattering fags jammed into every available nook and cranny.  not exactly an atmosphere conducive to conjuring up spirits, i thought to myself, but whatever.

the stage was set:  the furniture in the living room had been pushed to the periphery, and two opposing dining-room chairs set up at its center, with a third off to the side for the guy who'd be recording the spirit's every utterance on a legal pad [me, as it turned out].

when the time came, paul called for quiet, and he and royce took their places.

they sat across from each other so close that their feet were almost touching, and balanced the board on their knees.  upon this shaky foundation was laid the planchette, upon which the tips of their fingers came to rest.

as the room fell silent, paul called out, "is there anybody out there?  i'm sure this old house has some stories to tell."

nothing.

paul repeated the question, and waited--again, nothing.

this went on for several minutes, as the crowd grew increasingly raucous--when all of a sudden, the pointer jerked violently across the board to 'yes,' and royce said, "ah, we've got a live one."

the laughter stopped, and the room got very quiet.

our spirit's name, as it turned out, was jackrabbit, and he "answered" questions--from royce and paul, and from the audience at large--for almost an hour.

and boy, was he a chatterbox--i was writing down each letter the pointer stopped at, and i swear to god it was moving so fast i could barely keep up. i further swear that royce and paul's eyes were closed--hell, they weren't even looking down; there was no way they were doing this on their own, and the answers to each person's question were too weirdly on-point to be made up.

paul tired pretty quickly, so several of us took turns at the board, sitting across from royce, with varying degrees of success. some couldn't get the thing to move at all, and others could barely keep it on the board.

me?  i'll never forget the feeling that came over me when i took my place across from royce, placed my fingers on the planchette, someone called out a question--i don't remember what--and that goddam thing flew across the board, completely independent of any conscious effort on my part.  but once it happened, and i accepted that it was happening, it was almost like good sex--i just let go, and let the spirit take me where it would.

please remember--up to this point i had been about as sensitive to the "spirit world" as a pile of rocks, and this was my first tangible inkling that maybe there was something out there after all, even if it was nothing more than a collective consciousness we were tapping into.

anyway, as the alcohol flowed and the crowd's awe faded, the questions became silly, and the session ended when jackrabbit's answers began to take on a childish, petulant tone that quickly degenerated into dark, violent threats against a couple of the biggest wise-asses.  royce, who had warned us earlier to be respectful, said the spirit wasn't happy about not being taken seriously.

whatever--bottom line, what had started out as lighthearted fun turned ugly and scary just as fast, and we quit, headed out for the bars, and those of us who weren't already got shitfaced as quickly as possible.

*     *     *     *     *

we talked about doing it again, but somehow never got around to it--life, as it has a tendency to do, intervened.

andrew and i parted ways shortly thereafter.

royce, turns out, was closer to the other side than any of us knew.  his undoing--paul and i both tried to talk him out of it--would prove to be a late-term circumcision gone awry

a white-faced paul after viewing the damage: "lemme put it this way--if he ever wants a blowjob again, he'll have to drive to silverlake"

the resulting infection from which ultimately killed him.

i'd move out a few months after that, leaving paul with two new roommates--the legendary dougs--to fill the void royce and i left in our wake.

ultimately, paul himself would abandon 841 and move in with his friends rod and tim--who, while they welcomed him with open arms, wouldn't allow the ouija board under their roof.

which is how it ended up in my possession, forgotten until today.

my only regret is that i didn't clean out this corner of the garage a little earlier--this woulda been a perfect halloween post.


Tuesday, December 7, 2010

sandwich, anyone?

.
my mother was alive, although a mere tot, when the last american double eagle was minted.  just shy of a full ounce of gold, it was a thing of beauty:


and it was worth twenty american dollars--i.e., this damn thing was spending money.

of course, if you didn't wanna walk around with a bunch o' huge, clunky gold coins in your pockets, you could, like most people, use the infinitely-more convenient greenback instead



secure in the knowledge that, anytime you wanted, you could freely switch between the two.  because, as it had been since its inception, every american paper dollar in circulation--as it said right there on its face--was fully redeemable in an immutably-fixed amount of gold.

by the time my mother was eating solid food, that was no longer true--americans had by then been forced by their government to surrender their gold, given $20 and change for each ounce they possessed, and then left to watch in helpless dismay as that same government then hiked the exchange rate to $35 an ounce, thus (a) granting itself the ability to print tons of new dollars, which had the effect of (b) instantly diminishing its own citizens' wealth by almost half.

nice, huh?  all done in the name of patriotism, of course--and thus, dollar inflation was born.

we kept it in check for awhile, but only because our international trading partners weren't as easily cowed as our citizens--having gold-backed currencies themselves, they demanded the same from us.  and thus, gold remained internationally redeemable at $35 per ounce for almost 40 more years.

what changed?  simple:  the french, shrewdly realizing by the late 60's that we were running huge trade deficits and couldn't possibly be paying for the vietnam debacle without printing far more dollars than could be redeemed at a mere $35/oz, started demanding gold instead of greenbacks in settlement of trade.  this drain on fort knox went on until 1971, when nixon finally said "fuck it" and closed the gold window.

and thus, freed from the shackles of the gold standard, america fired up the printing presses and never looked back.

*     *     *     *     *

silver?  now, silver was different--a relatively cheap, unappreciated metal, silver remained the american coin of the realm well into my childhood.  quarters, dimes, half-dollars--they were all 90% silver until 1965.



until, that is, the money-sucking military-industrial complex swung into full gear, and that quickly changed.  i still remember how they sold our money's sudden new debasement to the american people:




see?  we were "saving" silver with these new coins.  they even had a cute name--they were called "sandwich" coins, for the fact that, instead of the solid silver of the originals, they consisted of a thick copper core, with a thin coating of cheap nickel on each side (i.e., not a speck of silver to be found).

i remember when they came into circulation, all the kids at school couldn't wait to trade their stodgy old silver coins for the neat new sandwich versions because they were so shiny and cool.  but we were just dumb kids--what did we know?

in retrospect, it's the reaction of the adults of america to the new coins that's so goddam disheartening.  most of 'em were old enough to remember when their gold had been taken away a mere 30 years before, but even with that memory fresh in their minds, they let their silver be stolen with nary a whimper.

*     *     *     *     *
today?

it would take seventy-one $20 bills to buy that same ounce of gold a single twenty woulda bought you in 1933.

the silver ratio's not as extreme--you can still pick up a pre-1965 silver quarter for only twenty-two of today's copper/nickel quarters--a bargain, you ask me.

why did i write this post?  because i'm tired of being called glenn beck, and because i'm tired of hearing all this bullshit from the government and the economists and the pseudo-intelligentsia about how gold and silver are barbarous relics which have no place in today's "modern" monetary system.

but mainly, because i'm tired of americans looking at "inflation" as just a commonplace occurrence, like the weather or something.  because it's not--it's a systematic, carefully calculated theft of your wealth.

eighty years ago, folks, gold was money in america--and forty-five years ago, silver was, too.

and you know what?  regardless of how much these assholes try to convince you otherwise, they still ARE money--in fact, the only money that matters.

a fact that's gonna become only more apparent in the coming months--trust me.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

mkf weighs in on the israeli/palestinian situation

.
so tonight i came across an anti-israel rant on a blog i follow to which i took exception, and since (a) posting around here has been light lately, and (b) my response to same was my first decent drunken comment in months, i'm re-posting it here before i stagger off to bed:

it always amazes me when, given the choice between supporting the israelis or the palestinians, the faggots almost always go with the side that would superglue their assholes shut right before beheading 'em.
me? i go with the side that doesn't inculcate its children from birth with the belief that the other side are subhuman pigs who deserve to be slaughtered in the streets, and that sacrificing themselves in the accomplishment of this goal is their god-given mission in life.
these people coulda had their own state 10 years ago--the israelis bent over backwards agreeing to every concession arafat asked for while clinton and madeline albright simultaneously kissed his ass, and it still wasn't enough. why? because that might've brought peace, and that's the last thing the palestinians really want--whiny, bomb-lobbing victimhood's much more fun.
don't worry, tho--the palestinians have demographics on their side, and through sheer numbers they'll overrun the israelis soon enough--i give it 20-30 years. and then the one oasis of stable, western-friendly civilization in the middle east will descend into the chaos characteristic of the rest of the region, and every faggot in america but me will raise a glass in celebration.
[and if none of the above moves you even a little, i recommend you get naked with at least one israeli soldier before you condemn the whole country to hell--trust me, it'll change even your brother's mind.]

and in case you're wondering, his name was shaly, it happened about 10 years ago over the course of a weekend at the century plaza hotel, and its effect on israeli/mkf relations was incalculable.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

yeah, so i've got ADD--eat me, you smug, skinny little bastard

.


so the other day i storm into the apple store in a righteous froth of indignation--my new toy's giving me less than half the battery life they promised and i wanna know why, goddammit.

genius:  have you changed your "energy saver" settings?

mkf:  no.

genius:  you're keeping the screen at no more than 3/4 brightness when you're on battery?

mkf, scornfully: yes.

genius:  you turn bluetooth off when you're not using it?

mkf:  of course.

genius:  are you watching movies at full volume, running multiple programs or doing anything else that requires a lot of processing power?

mkf: nah, i'm just surfing the web.  i'm tellin ya--there's something wrong with this thing, and i want a new one.

he turns the machine toward him, flips it open, pushes a button, snorts, pokes the genius next to him, says, "get this--guy's got 17 windows open and he's wondering why his battery's dying."




oh.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

tinfoil-hat wearers of the world, unite!



god knows i have my negative qualities, but i've never been one to gloat.

ok--almost never.

hey, we all have our limits--and after five solid years of ridicule and scorn for my "extremist" views, vindication has finally found me.

cast your mind, if you will, back in time to october 20, 2008 [i.e., back when i told y'all to buy gold for the first time].  the chart looked like this:




yeah,  $800--and boy, was i ripped to shreds by my sensible, mainstream-media-reading friends for even suggesting such idiocy.

flash-forward to this morning--a scant two years later:




that's right, bitches:  we're at $1,420--a mere 78% return over two years.  not bad for a falling-down drunk, if i do say so myself.

and although i haven't advertised it [what can i say--at some point even mkf gets tired of pissing in the wind], after a great run with gold, back in mid-august i rolled most of my paper holdings over to the infinitely-more-crazy silver stocks.

why, you ask?  because ben bernanke told me to.

and lemme tell ya--in the six days since good ol' ben banged the final nail into our collective national coffin via QE2, my 401(k) [in which i can't trade options] has risen by 20%, while my private trading account [in which i can] has more than doubled.

pyrrhic victory, of course: i win, even as my country goes down the tubes. almost sucks all the fun out of it.

almost.

Friday, November 5, 2010

an interim post

.
yeah, i know all three of you can't wait for my promised post-mortem of the dead-on-arrival california proposition 23--but while i'm putting it together, take a look at the following chart:


and now for the only statistic that really matters these days:  while california has been hemorrhaging jobs for the last 10 years, texas has been creating 'em literally by the hundreds of thousands.

as you ponder the above--and as preface to my prop 23 post--you might wanna ask yourself a couple questions:

(1) why is it that the most highly-taxed and/or unionized states are generally also the ones that have the highest unemployment and/or are the most broke?

      and more particularly to the topic at hand,

(2)  what's more important in the overall scheme of things:  further impoverishing an already-bankrupt state for the strictly symbolic cause of "saving the planet", or preserving what little industry and technology said state state still possesses in order to provide employment for its remaining productive citizens?

california, in its wisdom, just made its choice.  tell me, what do you think?